friscofirst.com friscofirst.com - Frisco First | Official Mayor Maher Maso Campaign Web Site.

friscofirst.comWebsite Profile

Title: Frisco First | Official Mayor Maher Maso Campaign Web Site.
Keywords:
Description:Frisco First | Official Mayor Maher Maso Campaign Web Site. Skip to content Home Meet Maher Maso Accomplishments Talking Points & Issues Links & Articles Council Meeting FAQ Frisco Facts Frisco Popula
lptelecom.ca is ranked 25408406 in the world (amongst the 40 million domains). A low-numbered rank means that this website gets lots of visitors. This site is relatively popular among users in the united states. It gets 50% of its traffic from the united states .This site is estimated to be worth $2,503. This site has a low Pagerank(0/10). It has 1 backlinks. lptelecom.ca has 43% seo score.

friscofirst.com Information

Website / Domain:friscofirst.com
Website IP Address:67.211.37.7
Domain DNS Server:ns2.ncc.com,ns1.ncc.com

friscofirst.com ranks

Alexa Rank:23913759
EveryoneDomain Rank:1
Google Page Rank:0/10 (Google Pagerank Has Been Closed)

friscofirst.com Traffic & Earnings

Purchase/Sale Value:$3,312
Daily Revenue:$9
Monthly Revenue:$272
Yearly Revenue:$$3,312
Daily Unique Visitors:835
Monthly Unique Visitors:25,050
Yearly Unique Visitors:304,775

friscofirst.com WebSite Httpheader

StatusCode 200
Vary Accept-Encoding
Connection Keep-Alive
Transfer-Encoding chunked
Content-Type text/html; charset=UTF-8
Server Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:16:36 GMT

friscofirst.com WebSite Httpheader

Keyword Count Percentage

friscofirst.com Similar Website

Domain WebSite Title
patrickforgovernor.com Official Campaign Web Site
jeremy-bamber.co.uk Jeremy Bamber Campaign Official Web Site
stroublefortallahassee.com StroubleForTallahassee.com – The official campaign web site for Bruce Strouble
kaitlynmaher.com Kaitlyn Maher :: Official Artist Site
daithao.org Dai Thao for Mayor | Official Campaign Website
campaignpartner.net Jane Smith for Mayor - A Campaign Partner Sample Site
votejanesmith.com Jane Smith for Mayor - A Campaign Partner Sample Site
cosfd2.com Elect Asegun Henry | The official web site of the Asegun Henry campaign.
jft.vn J-first Tokyo - Official Web Site -
myfirststory.net MY FIRST STORY OFFICIAL WEB SITE
forestparkfrisco.com Forest Park Frisco Official Site
mayorofwycombe.com Mayor of High Wycombe | Official site for Mayor of High Wycombe
americanpatriotparty.cc American Patriot Party Official National Web Site, American Patriot Party National Campaign a...
bountyhunterreunion.com Bounty Hunter? - The First and Still Kickin' - Official Band Web Site
mayorbury.com The Official Site of Oak Lawn's Mayor Sandra Bury
alhambramayor.com Campaign for Mayor of Alhambra - HOME
inhrcc.com Indiana House Republican Campaign Committee | Official site
kentforwv.com Kent For WV | Official Campaign site of Kent Leonhardt

friscofirst.com Alexa Rank History Chart

friscofirst.com aleax

friscofirst.com Html To Plain Text

Frisco First | Official Mayor Maher Maso Campaign Web Site. Skip to content Home Meet Maher Maso Accomplishments Talking Points & Issues Links & Articles Council Meeting FAQ Frisco Facts Frisco Population Elected Officials Community Calendar Contact Maher Maso ← Older posts Take or Pay – or is it really? Posted on December 16, 2016 by mmaso Title One: Someone must pay Or Title Two: It’s really complicated I couldn’t figure out a great title for this note – Is it a tale of two cities (one that is growing and one that is not), or is it “It’s really complicated” or “someone has to pay.” I could just go with “My Head Really Hurts.” By now, you have seen the press conference that Garland, Mesquite, Plano and Richardson held recently stating their case of why they have asked the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to intervene in how much they pay for water. Here is a link to the DMN article: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/environment/2016/12/14/garland-mesquite-plano-richardson-want-state-help-lower-rising-water-rates Obviously, there is much more detail to the issue than what was presented. The information that Garland, Mesquite, Plano and Richardson presented is accurate and truthful for their situation. However, it does not address the needs and situation of the other nine cities or the history of the agreements. First things first; what is North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD)? According to NTMWD, they sell water to more than 1.6 million people in 90 communities. Out of those 90 communities, there are 13 member cities who each appoint two board members to the governing body of NTMWD. The 13 member cities are: Allen Farmersville Forney Frisco Garland McKinney Mesquite Plano Princeton Richardson Rockwall Royse City Wylie -You can learn more about the water district at www.ntmwd.com. Take or Pay You hear the term “Take or Pay” often, so what does it really mean? The short version is that a member of NTMWD is obligated, through contract, to pay for a set amount of water each year, whether the member uses it or not. That “minimum” amount is set as the greatest single year of use. To use Plano as an example, Plano used approximately 26 billion gallons of water in the year 2001. Since 2001, Plano has not used that much water, yet it is contractually obligated to pay for 26 billion gallons of water annually whether it uses it or not. This is the structure of NTMWD and what every city that is a member agreed to when they became a member. Why is Take or Pay even in place? NTMWD is obligated to build the infrastructure to serve the water needs of communities. This includes water lines, pump stations, reservoirs, treatment facilities and manpower. Thus, if a city, such as Plano, used 26 billion gallons of water in 2001, NTMWD had to build the needed capacity to serve that amount of usage. In other words, NTMWD sold debt and spent large amounts of money to meet that need as well as obligated NTMWD to maintaining that infrastructure. If Plano reduces its usage, someone must pay for that debt as that infrastructure cannot be given back and still must be maintained. The narrative being used in the press conference is some cities are paying for water their customers are not using and that it is unfair. That, in my opinion, is not an accurate description of what is taking place. A more accurate narrative is those cities are paying for infrastructure they needed and used. Now that those cities are not fully using infrastructure that was built and has to be maintained, those cities feel that someone else should pay for the debt that was partially accumulated to meet their needs. I know that is blunt, but that is exactly what would happen if the contractual obligations are nullified. The four cities asking the PUC to intervene were the favorable recipients of the NTMWD model during their rapid growth phases and now that the model is no longer favorable, those same cities are proposing to change the rules that they signed on to and place additional burdens on the other member cities. This is a critical point: Nothing has changed. All the member cities signed very detailed contracts agreeing to NTMWD funding model and member city obligations. Those cities benefited from this system as they were growing. A stable water supply actually helped those cities grow and succeed just as it does for us. I spend much of my time explaining to our residents that we won’t run out of water, but the real question is how much would our taxpayers be willing to pay for that water? In other words, if our residents use excess water today, Frisco and NTMWD must build the infrastructure to pay for the water and the local taxpayer, as well as future taxpayers, will continue to pay for the infrastucture. Frisco believes in local control and if our residents choose to waste water today, tax dollars will be used to pay for the water. We hope we have stressed the need to conserve to our residents and are always working on innovative ways to communicate the importance of doing all we can today to protect our future. All the cities in the NTMWD service area know exactly what their obligations are now and well into the future. The control and cost really belong in those communities, where it should be. What can we agree on? Let’s start with the things that we can all agree on: The current system does not facilitate conservation of this valuable resource. You are paying for the water whether you use it or not. If a city does not encourage residents to use (waste?) water, it will not receive the needed revenue from selling the water that it purchased. Clearly, there is no incentive for those cities to conserve water. Growing cities, such as Frisco, do not want to absorb the cost of the infrastructure and debt that was built to serve some of those cities now paying for unused water. Even fast growth cities, such as Frisco, will one day be in the same situation. As a community builds out and, hopefully, continues to find ways to conserve this resource, a community may find that is paying for water it’s not using. Again, using the narrative above, it will continue to pay for and maintain the infrastructure that was built to handle its needs during peak growth. Frisco has already been in situations where it paid for water that it did not use. We will continue to encourage our residents to conserve water because it saves a valuable resource AND impacts their pocketbook. NTMWD calculates its annual rate to all members based on the minimums in place. In other words, it is a stable revenue stream and the rates for all member cities are based on the annual revenue NTMWD receives. If that revenue in reduced in one area, it will be increased in another. If it is reduced for one costumer, it must be increased for another (or all). Bond ratings are based on the ability of NTMWD to pay the debt. The model currently in place gives NTMWD strong bond ratings and allows NTMWD to continue to build infrastructure for many customers while ge...

friscofirst.com Whois

Domain Name: FRISCOFIRST.COM
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Registrant Name: Maher Maso
Registrant Organization: Maso Inc.
Name Server: NS2.NCC.COM
Name Server: NS1.NCC.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2018-09-20T05:16:36Z

The data contained in Everyone.domains, LLC's WhoIs database,
while believed by the company to be reliable, is provided "as is"
with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy. This
information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you
in obtaining information about domain name registration records.
Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden without the prior written
permission of EveryOne.domains, LLC.By submitting an inquiry,
you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty.In particular,
you agree not to use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise make possible,
dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety, for any
purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and
and solicitations of any kind, including spam.You further agree
not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic electronic
processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose,
including mining this data for your own personal or commercial purposes.


Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified
in the "registrant" section.In most cases, Everyone.domains, LLC
is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database.";

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes-2014-06-16-en